Hostility at Huffington

Argue.gif
Hostility at Huffington

I think we can disagree without being dismissive. It appears the majority of those commenting on my recent column don’t think so.

Two weeks ago I wrote a column titled “The Resurrection of Jesus: Believing the Impossible Is Possible.” I affirmed the simple assertion, believed by billions of people throughout the centuries, from the Apostles Creed: On the third day, Jesus rose again and ascended into heaven.

The column generated more than 1,500 comments on the Huffington Post, the majority of them dismissing even the possibility of Jesus’ resurrection. Most objections were made by materialists who argue that if it can’t be measured, it doesn’t exist and isn’t real.

“There is no `faith’ involved in science. A question is asked …either data supports a conclusion about the question, or it does not,” one commenter said. “If the data doesn’t support the conclusion then that data is discarded and more data is collected.”

Many comments centered on the unreliability of the biblical texts.

“I just find it hard to believe in something that offers no evidence
besides from the one book which the story originated from,” read
another.

“I don’t see how Doubting Thomas is evidence of the resurrection when
it is in the same questionable book that teaches about the
resurrection.”

“Outside of the Bible, there’s no credible evidence that Jesus, as
portrayed, even existed.”

But it was the hostile tone more than the content of the arguments
that really caught my attention.

“We have brains,” read one. “Sorry if that’s inconvenient for you.”

Ouch.

“Atheists see no credible evidence to believe in any gods or to
subscribe to any religion or dogma. That’s it.”

“Oh, puleeeeeez-e,” read another. “Resurrections, ascensions,
transubstantiations, immaculate conceptions, etc., are nothing more than
the coins of the realm of psychosis! Who cares?”

Dismissive quips were more common than reasonable dialogue.

“Talking logic and reason with a religious person is like talking
about discrete mathematics to a poodle.”

Double ouch.

“More make-believe concepts. It’s just pixie dust and science
fiction.”

“When it comes to religious beliefs, we suffer a regression that
turns us into children that still believe in Santa Claus and the tooth
fairy.”

“God IS impossible.”

What can we learn from this thread of comments?

First, the scientific method, which is useful for measuring the
material, is being used to dismiss the spiritual — a radical position
not historically taken by scientists.

Even the late evolutionary biologist Stephen Gould said, “Science
simply cannot adjudicate the issue of God’s possible superintendence of
nature. We neither affirm nor deny it; we simply can’t comment on it as
scientists.”

Second, it appears the opinions of the Jesus Seminar and fictional
books like “The Da Vinci Code” are trusted more than contemporary
textual research about the New Testament.

Most scholars now date the New Testament manuscripts earlier rather
than later, making them, as even liberal scholar John A. T. Robinson
agrees, “by far the best-attested text of any writing in the ancient
world.”

By comparison, the earliest extant copies of Julius Caesar’s works
are dated 1,000 years after his death, those of Plato 1,200 years after
his death and those of Aristotle 1,400 years after his death. Yet
scholars universally accept the authenticity of these manuscripts.

Third, as online commentary replaces in-person, interactive
dialogue, civility and reason have given way to the kind of caustic,
dismissive one-liners you might hear from Jon Stewart, “Saturday Night
Live” or Bill Maher. People are entitled to their own opinions, and my
column is an opinion editorial. All of us, however, could benefit from
ratcheting down the one-liners and beefing up the substance and
relevance of our comments.

Actually caring about people we encounter online would be nice. I
picked up that spirit from one post: “This has been an interesting
thread. I have enjoyed the exchange and sincerely hope I have not
offended any religious folks with my dogged skepticism.”

Finally, there seems to be an almost irrational hostility toward
belief on the part of unbelievers. I would simply urge unbelievers to
consider the fact that throughout the centuries, many of the best and
brightest thinkers — even in the sciences — have believed in the
resurrection and ascension of Jesus.

That’s not to say they are right, but it is to say that all
believers can’t be dismissed as brainless, deluded psychotics.

We can disagree without being dismissive.

Yours for the pursuit of God in the company of friends, Dick Staub.

PS. And remember, “these are the best of times and the worst of times, but they are the only times we have.” (For Now).

Order Dick’s Newest Book: About You, Fully Human. Fully Alive

Click here to listen to our latest daily podcast of “The Kindlings Muse”. “The Kindlings Muse” rekindling our spiritual, intellectual and creative potential.”

PS 2. Order one of Dick’s books from amazon: Christian Wisdom of the Jedi Masters
OR
The Culturally Savvy Christian: A Manifesto for Deepening Faith and Enriching Popular Culture in an Age of Christianity-Lite

PS 3. If you haven’t yet done so, register for our daily updates. You won’t regret it!

  • Register for CW
  • PS 3.

    If you have comments regarding this column please contact us at:

  • CultureWatch: culturewatch@dickstaub.com
  •  

    PS 4. This web site is supported solely by tax-deductible donations. Please mail your generous contributions to: The Kindlings/CFC (The Center for Faith and Culture), PO Box 729, Eastsound, Washington 98245

    ‚©CRS Communications 2010

    Posted in Staublog in December 2, 2010 by | No Comments »

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.

    17 + = 18

    More from Staublog